Altreus |
I made a new bot running on a carbon-based AI system |
apeiron |
carbon-based? So it's written in C for a Mac? |
Altreus |
no it's me |
rindolf |
Altreus: you're a natural stupidity system - not an artificial intelligence one. |
rindolf |
Altreus: or maybe natural intelligence. |
Altreus |
well you're a poo poo head |
Altreus |
:) |
apeiron |
perlbot, altreus is also six years old |
perlbot |
apeiron: Stored altreus is a small cat (see: http://avatars.plurk.com/3405142-big.jpg) | six years old |
Altreus |
That's generous |
rindolf |
Altreus: calling someone a "poo poo head" proves that this person has natural stupidity. |
Altreus |
rindolf: But the natural stupidity was postulated before the use of the phrase; hence you can't discount the fact that using the phrase was in response to, rather than proof of, the assertion. |
rindolf |
Altreus: yes, but it still proved it after the fact. |
rindolf |
Altreus: Q.E.D. |
Altreus |
rindolf: Except it is possible for an intelligent system to act stupid |
Altreus |
hence it is not, in fact, proof. |
rindolf |
Altreus: that's right - it has the right to in fact. |
Altreus |
Indeed. So given that it has the ability, the right, and the motivation to do so, it is reasonable to assume that in fact that is what happened |
rindolf |
Altreus: OK. |
Altreus |
You would have to gather further data on the system to determine it. |
rindolf |
Altreus: in that case, calling someone a "poo poo head" has the property of having natural stupidity. |
rindolf |
Or acting under the influence of natural stupidity. |
rindolf |
Possibly artificial natural stupidity. |
Altreus |
rindolf: artificial natural stupidity ._. |
Altreus |
I think your sentence is at odds with itself |
Altreus |
Well, your fragment |
rindolf |
Altreus: it's an oxymoron. |
Altreus |
correct |
rindolf |
Oxymorons are indicative of natural stupidity. |
Altreus |
I gave the artificial impression of natural stupidity! |
Altreus |
Stupid phrases are an indication of a) stupidity or b) intelligence |
rindolf |
Hence stupid phrases are not indicative. |
Altreus |
Quite so |
rindolf |
Only intelligent phrases can be indicative of something. |
Altreus |
Stupidity is an absence, and you cannot prove an absence without first proving an exhaustive set. |
rindolf |
Wise men know they are stupid. |
Altreus |
:) |
rindolf |
Whereas foolish people think they are not. |
rindolf |
The earliest Greek philosophers tried to philosophise in verse. |
rindolf |
Which didn't work too well. |
Altreus |
Maybe they should have chosen a different meter |